Zombies vs Vampire

So there been a bit of a fetish these days with Zombies vs Vampire.
A person somewhere in time would of had to come up with the decision of what a Zombie or Vampire. Is it wrong to come up with a make-believe character like that ? Probably not.

Is it wrong for the viewer to start becoming assessed with Zombies and Vampires because they are somehow connected with the storyline and character ? Probably not.

Would it be wrong however to use analogies from such movies to develop one's life philosophy around ?

For instance, an individual may somehow come to the conclusion that :

1. They are a zombie as they spend all their days on the computer in the dark. Or maybe they spend or the time daydreaming / lucid dreaming that they're never actually present in their bodies.
2. Then you have vampires who may come across as all innocent but are actually they're to suck your life spirit.

It be pretty weird to go around naming people one or the two. You probably end up in an institution quick smart.

However, this notion of using a created model to define how you define or interact with other does happen. Who to say it wrong to think of a person as a zombie even if you treat them as human. Sure is a strange world we live in.

Original Decision

Trying to filter out what is actually the fundamental decision we make as a human.
The big bang decision that defines us at least enough to categories people into groups.

Some potential candidates

1. Belief in God    vs          People as God (i.e. Elvis or self)
2. World is good    vs     World is bad
3. There will be world peace       vs    There will not be world peace 

Russian Doll Philosophy

One particular theory of life is there is that we live in a Russian Doll body whereby we are the outer doll and we trying very hard to follow what the nucleus doll is saying but the nucleus only gives what it want when it wants. Depending how we act and the nucleus grace we may never even be getting signals from the nucleus. We create many inner ego shells which sometime means the message is quite thing.

Then if you think of the whole word of Russian Dolls which have copies of the same nucleus. Then the only thing that differs a person is the absence of the nucleus. If such a view is supported it does make it quite scary to think that all wrongs in the world have all just been misinterpretation of the nucleus. 

And if the people are misguided then the idea driven are also misguided. 

Another interesting thought experiment is with more Russian dolls is there an eventual system of order such that false ideas are improved by better ones. 

It hard to know for sure as much as people want a better world, there also those that want to protect the status quo.

One clear observation at present is that the following aspects are making the inner connectedness between the dolls closer. Which should make it more easier for people to call out ideas not from the nucleus.
- survelience cameras
- cybersecurity
- police enforcement
- land borders
- sound recording
- accessible of social media platforms 

Satire

In this scene of a movie I one day may watch a priest states that Jesus is behind a door behind a door. It delivered in such a satrical way that the scene quite humour. How a person responds will be largely based on a person acceptance of what is tolerable as humour and their belief system.

It interesting how comedy can transcend in this manner.

Being controlled by sin

If we look at the world from the point of view of a person there is distinct start (birth) and end point (death). However, when it comes to our sub-consciousness we only really begin to fully appreciate as we start to remember things. Over this age of development, children begin to learn to good from bad and start to define what they have done as either good or bad. 

Can a person ever not commit a sin in a lifetime. I am thinking no particularly commandments such as "Honour father" & mother and do not lie. So what happens next do we spend the rest of our live in remorse ? forget ? or forgiving/accepting ? 

Each action has different consequences in term of short term or long term benefits. For instance the acceptance might be a higher stance from a long term perspective. The person could be said to be lived and and learned.

Holding on to the wrong can be considered to create a fault line in the character. People who have committed the same sins will be able more easily identify those that have such faults. Using words as swords other people are actually able to use these fault line for control. 

I do not want to go through these methods as there already enough people out in the world trying to exploit people fault for control.

Who would want to rule over other 

- those that have sinned and cant forgive themselves

- those that desire is to control others (always a bad thing ???)

There are however strategies that can be employed to counteract the tactics of other 

- know thyself 

- observe surrounding 

- trust self 

- trust in beliefs 

Angel battle

A interesting question would be who is more like an angel and who is more like a devil. In the battle scenes lets first assume that there is one character more demon like then the other. What that means is that they are more likely to use unlawful measures to win and probably have accumulated a number of fighting skills from all their fights while the Angel is more younger in these areas. So how does an angel beat a demon at their own game. Well to me it seems that the angel will need preparation and not just through reading religious text but also other measures such as fighting skills, life philosophy. gym work. They then go to fight the demon.

The problem is that the Angel is having to resort to a bit of the demon way to beat they demon. It hard to come out of this unscathed. If they are hurt who can they call for repair. Well in heaven I am assuming this will be all sorted. But in our dimension the Angel will need a support crew. Essentially, angels to pull the spirit level back. 

I have noticed this short fable of a person tackling something for the greater good and being sucked into a hole is all to familiar. Howl's Moving Castle is one such movie but many other stories exist. In the real world is it common people are taking on battles against demon they see on the outside all the time. Having support crew is quite critical to ensure that the person does not succumb to the system. 

Battleship

In the Battle Ship game the goal is to sink the opponent ship before the opponent sinks you. The ships however could be anywhere and all the opponent can do is make educated guesses.

Now let the opponent as say "Goliath: and you as a standard human.
And instead of a simple set-up of each side having equal side ships, each character accumulates skills and attributes over the life time which may have the impact of
- having more power i.e. more ships
- developing ways of distracting the opponent
- barrier protection i.e. stronger ships

Can you ever learn too much tatics that your performance is impacted. How many chances do you have before your ships are sunk ?

Diversion Tatics

Using atom model for this entry.
Whereby, I represent the interaction a human has to the world as akin to that of an atom.

Why do I think there are similarities.

Well firstly the atom is small and is influenced by many factors from the outside world.

Secondly, it has many layers just like Human psyche. For instance, the different ego shells that we use to define to self in our surroundings.

Now in the model, the outer world will judge  not by the nucleus but by the outer edge. Some lucky friends may learn more about your other shells. But for the most part, it will be a battle between the outer shell and the people on the outside.

This creates a number of potential problems:
- Do we search the world to find more people that like our outer shell /nuclues
- Do we just be own individual and just ignore the battle cries from the other
- Do we let down our guard and trust people will see you and nucleus is good
- Is pain good or bad and in what situation 

How about if lacking in confidence of what is the right. I noticed the comment fake to you make it used a lot. Is there potentially a lot more people doing this then we think. For instance could the people that say that they are really authentic actually trying to divert people from a void that they do not know how to handle things.

How about using diversion tatics. This is where you essentially play out your cards down in a way that the people you don't want stay away and the one you are likely to trust stay.

There probably lots of ways this can be done but just as an example. - Say you get a devil tattoo. the people that see the outer shell may see you as some sort of bad person. The tattoo is actually irrelevant to your character (As long as you have not convinced your nucleus the same thing). So now just left with the people genuine interested in learning.

In the same way the person may have many have countless diversion tactics up there sleeve. And so it good for self protection. The risk however is that in the jumping and dancing around you actually miss out on the chance to genuinely connect. As ultimately, other people will judge you on character just as much as the vice versa.